Get Bonus

Last updated November 2026

Pokies RTP Database

Casinos and pokies scored on the same rules, with payout times in hours.

Get Bonus

Our pokies RTP database lists the return to player that each studio publishes for 25 popular games, collected on 4 November 2026. Figures range from 96.80% on Dead or Alive 2 down to 88.12% on Mega Moolah, whose jackpot is funded from that gap.

How the Pokies RTP Database Works

RTP is the share of all stakes a pokie is designed to pay back over a very large number of spins. A 96.50% game returns A$96.50 per A$100 wagered in the long run, and keeps A$3.50. It says nothing about a single session, where results swing widely.

Each figure below comes from the studio's own game page where one was available, and from a named review source otherwise. When the two disagreed, we kept the studio's figure: Sweet Bonanza shows 96.48% from Pragmatic Play, not the 96.6% one review lists. Two Play'n GO titles, Fire Joker and Reactoonz, are left out because their RTP was not shown on the provider pages we checked. The method matches the one on our review methodology page.

Pokies RTP List, Highest to Lowest

The pokies RTP list below runs from the highest provider figure in our records to the lowest.

PokieProviderRTPVolatilityJackpot
Dead or Alive 2NetEnt96.80%HighNo
Big Bass BonanzaPragmatic Play96.71%Not publishedNo
Big Bass SplashPragmatic Play96.71%Medium (one source)No
Mega FortuneNetEnt96.60%Not publishedProgressive
Divine FortuneNetEnt96.59%MediumProgressive
Legacy of DeadPlay'n GO96.58%HighNo
Buffalo King MegawaysPragmatic Play96.52%HighNo
The Dog HousePragmatic Play96.51%Medium (one source)No
Gates of OlympusPragmatic Play96.50%Not publishedNo
Starlight PrincessPragmatic Play96.50%Not publishedNo
Sugar RushPragmatic Play96.50%HighNo
Sweet BonanzaPragmatic Play96.48%Not publishedNo
Book of DeadPlay'n GO96.21%HighNo
StarburstNetEnt96.08%Low-mediumNo
Wolf GoldPragmatic Play96.01%Not publishedFixed
Gonzo's QuestNetEnt95.97%MediumNo
Hall of GodsNetEnt95.70%Not publishedProgressive
Arabian NightsNetEnt95.62%Not publishedProgressive
Elvis Frog in VegasBGaming95.30%Medium-highNo
Age of the GodsPlaytech95.02%MediumProgressive
Jackpot GiantPlaytech94.22%MediumProgressive
Wheel of Wishes (WowPot)Games Global93.34%LowProgressive
Treasure NileGames Global92.11%MediumProgressive
Major MillionsGames Global89.37%Not publishedProgressive
Mega MoolahGames Global88.12%LowProgressive

Reading High RTP Pokies Figures

High RTP pokies cluster tightly: 13 of the 25 games sit between 96.21% and 96.80%. The difference between 96.50% and 96.71% is A$0.21 per A$100 wagered, which matters less than volatility and bonus terms for most players.

The bigger gaps are elsewhere. Every game under 95% in this list is a progressive jackpot title, and the lowest four are all from the Games Global jackpot range. If you are clearing bonus wagering, a high RTP pokie with a fixed top prize stretches a balance further than a jackpot game. If you are chasing a life-changing prize, the lower base return is the price of entry.

Use these provider figures alongside the casino's own game information screen, and check the casino's bonus terms for excluded or reduced-contribution games before you start. More context on each casino sits on the Verified Pokies home page.

FAQ

Is the RTP in the database the RTP I get at the casino?

Not always. The figure is the provider's standard version. Studios also offer lower RTP settings, and a casino may choose one of them. Open the game's information or paytable screen to see the RTP of the version you are playing.

Why do jackpot pokies have a lower RTP?

Part of every stake feeds the progressive jackpot pool, and that share is not counted in the base game return in the same way. Mega Moolah at 88.12% and Major Millions at 89.37% are the clearest examples in our records.

Why are some volatility fields empty?

We only record volatility when the provider page or a reliable source states it. For Gates of Olympus, sources disagreed between medium and high, so the field shows Not published rather than a guess.